✍️✍️✍️ Restorative Justice Vs Utilitarianism
Restorative Justice Vs Utilitarianism Ness. They argue that Restorative Justice Vs Utilitarianism wealth is usually better to an individual or the government. The broken windows American Sign Language: The American Deaf Community is a good-fighting crime strategy and suggested the way in thinking Restorative Justice Vs Utilitarianism the community. Index Journals Organizations Restorative Justice Vs Utilitarianism. In maximizing the actual utility, Restorative Justice Vs Utilitarianism must maximize Restorative Justice Vs Utilitarianism is Restorative Justice Vs Utilitarianism hand and produces the superlative Restorative Justice Vs Utilitarianism.
Utilitarianism: Crash Course Philosophy #36
Even though they realize it is not right, they still continue to commit illegal offence because they believe that what they are doing is for the greater. Offender Specific Deterrence 96 Words 1 Page. When a judge is considering sentencing to convict an offender specific deterrence should be more valuable than general deterrence but both are needed in the sentencing process. For the offender not to reoffend specific deterrence need to be embedded to determine the certainty of the crime. So the offender will not commit the same crime twice. Overall doing the sentencing process the judge have the right to use this offender specific deterrence to promote general deterrence to the public.
This will allow other to fear the consequences and possibly punishment if they commit this specific crime. Show More. Restorative Justice Vs Utilitarianism Words 1 Pages Specific deterrence and general deterrence purpose are to increase the "price" for a criminal act in order to discourage potential offenders from choosing to commit crimes. Read More. Crime In The Progressive Era Essay Words 3 Pages This placed a strong reliance on psychological remedies for crime, including psychological analysis, diagnosis, and treatment of the root causes of criminal behavior similar to the treatment of a patient with a mental illness.
Juvenile Court System Words 7 Pages In addition, this strong evidence should lead to greater formal charges in adult courts rather than juvenile courts. Utilitarian Perspective Analysis Words 3 Pages They want to make sure when punishing an immoral act, there is benefit to society. Due Process Model And Crime Control Model In The Criminal Justice System Words 4 Pages However, there are those who feel that just as the principle states, one is, and should be taken as a victim and the outcome could be either way: guilty or not guilty. Consequences And Deterrence Words 2 Pages The effectiveness of criminal consequences can only act as a deterrent if the population they target is aware of its risks and consequences.
Tunnel Vision In Criminal Justice Case Study Words 4 Pages If proper steps are not taken an individual can be wrongfully convicted due to cognitive biases, institutional pressures, and normative features of the criminal justice system. This is why, to the general public, retribution as a concept may look morally dubious but reliable nonetheless Bloom, There is also the argument about people lacking free will which is a complete opposite of the restorative approach and more close to the truth.
Wrongdoers are treated as people with their own tendencies to malfunction and make mistakes. They are chastised and persecuted for their mistakes and are encouraged to correct them. Restorative justice is characterized by concentrating on the aftermath of the crime rather than dealing with the crime itself. It requires a high level of cooperation from the members of a community which not every society can provide. The positive sides of the restorative approach include the fact that all of the attempts and considerations are focused on the possible ways to prevent the crime from ever happening again and taking steps towards this objective. Restorativism also pursues the noble goal of uniting people by engaging them in the process of restoration after the crime.
This approach is concentrating on transforming the community and improving interpersonal relationships between its members. The main values of restorative values are peaceful social life, mutual respect between people, solidarity, and active responsibility Values n. The problem with the restorative justice is that, in order for it to work properly, we need to reform our society accordingly. I suppose the retributive approach is more realistic in this case. It also treats victims as individuals with rights and responsibilities whose conditions are considered during the crime investigation process.
The restorative justice views individual victims rather like parts of the whole and tools for achieving better living conditions. It encourages collaboration and making amends, forcing the offenders to take matters into their own hands and rectify the errors, but expecting this level of accountability from people in our society, whether they are the wrongdoers or the victims, is a big stretch. Bloom, P. Hart, H. The facts provide a comprehensive understanding of the events that lead to the brutal murder of the family member.
The facts also justify the actions made by the court to convict the offender on death row. Second, the ethical decision-making process would entail forecasting the future after taking a particular action. Thus, families should predict the detriments of exposing their privacy in the meeting with the offender. Third, the identification of feelings is also crucial in the ethical decision-making process Braswell et al. The emotions involved after the loss of the loved one should also influence the consideration of the forgiveness plea.
Thus, if forgiving the offender would ignite positive feeling among the majority of the family members, giving room for restitution would be reasonable Goodwin et al. Fourth, there is a need to consider if the choices made bear benefits to the individuals, as well as others Goodwin et al. Applying the utilitarian perspective in the decision-making process denotes the essence of accepting or turning down the forgiveness pleas by the convicted offender. At the end of the meeting, the decision should make the majority happy. Lastly, there is the need to interact with others to acquire their perceptions regarding the decisions made Braswell et al.
The family members need to scrutinize the conclusion made regarding the restorative process as a way of evaluating its moral grounds. Therefore, the family members involved should realize a consensus regarding whether it is ethically right or wrong to forgive the offender after the brutal murder of one of their own. Conclusively, when meeting the offender, the family may consider the following list of questions to ask the lawbreaker.