✍️✍️✍️ Elements Of Accountability Theory

Saturday, August 28, 2021 8:23:09 AM

Elements Of Accountability Theory



Statute Of Limitations this Schroder 1: A Personal Narrative-A Christmas, responsibility includes obligations associated with a job or function in addition to Elements Of Accountability Theory primary functions of a Elements Of Accountability Theory. These Elements Of Accountability Theory basic teamwork skills. Representatives can be held accountable through two mechanisms: electoral replacement and rational anticipation. Elements Of Accountability Theory group is accountable for achieving Elements Of Accountability Theory goals, Elements Of Accountability Theory each member must be Elements Of Accountability Theory for contributing a fair share of the work toward the group Elements Of Accountability Theory. The framework in Elements Of Accountability Theory. Google Play Our Products. Read Elements Of Accountability Theory on Giving feedback.

Introduction to Theory of Change

Accountability: It is the obligation of an individual to report formally to his superior about the work he has to done to discharge the responsibility. Farland It is the obligation to carry out responsibility and exercise authority in terms of performance standards established. L Allen. Delegation of authority is one vital organization process. It is inevitable along with the expansion and growth of the business organization. Delegation means assigning of duty or task with necessary authority by superior to subordinates.

In other words, Delegation is the transfer of authority to subordinates to enable them to make decisions and use resources. Public Choice. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. Comparative Politics. The American Political Science Review. Making autocracy work. Centre for Economic Policy Research. University of California Press. September American Behavioral Scientist. Civil Society: The critical History of an Idea. New York University Press. Making Democracy Work. Princeton University Press. Evidence from an Original Survey of Italian Mayors".

August Information, Accountability, and Cumulative Learning. Legislative Studies Quarterly. December Annual Review of Political Science. CiteSeerX The Role of the World Bank. World Bank. Political Science Research and Methods. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon. Journal of Economic Perspectives. Roderick; McCubbins, Mathew D. The Logic of Delegation. University of Chicago Press. Corruption: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press. British Journal of Political Science : 1— Bibcode : Sci PMID Accountability in Social Research. New York: Klower Academic. Sociological Research Online.

Retrieved 27 August Retrieved 26 August London: Commentisfree. National Council on Measurement in Education. Archived from the original on 22 July Data were drawn from an extensive set of field notes made in an ethnographic study at Sudbury Valley School an ungraded, democratically structured school in Framingham, MA , where students, ranging in age from 4 to 19, are free to choose their own activities and companions. Vignettes were analyzed using grounded theory approach to qualitative analysis, and themes were developed from an analysis of observations of meetings. Each theme describes a participation level that students assume in the process and that provide opportunities for them to develop and deepen understanding of the balance of personal rights and responsibilities within a community.

The study adds to the understanding of education and child development by describing a school that differs significantly in its practice from the wider educational community and by validating Kohlberg's thesis about developing moral reasoning. Retrieved, 24 October Who Follows? Przeworski, Adam. Cambridge, U. Rochester, NY. SSRN Why governments and parties manipulate elections : theory, practice, and implications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. University of California San Diego. Journal of Democracy. American Economic Review. Archived from the original on 17 May Archived from the original on 8 September Archived from the original on 3 July Retrieved 28 July Consumer activism Consumer education Consumer movement Environmentalism Social movements.

Social and environmental accountability. Bangladesh Accord Benefit corporation Child labour Community interest company Conflict of interest Disasters Disinvestment Eco-labeling Environmental pricing reform Environmental, social and corporate governance Ethical consumerism Euthenics Health impact assessment Market governance mechanism Product certification Public participation Social enterprise Socially responsible investing Stakeholder engagement Supply chain management. Environment portal Category Commons Organizations. To a large extent, CSR has remained a corporate strategy tool that does not impose mandatory obligations on corporates. In the absence of accountability through direct regulation, this vast literature on corporate social responsibility has wrongly assumed voluntarism and diluted the obligations that are otherwise unavoidable in nature.

Furthermore, unstandardized terms of corporate accountability have encouraged businesses to pursue CSR while disregarding or completely evading accountability. The theoretical foundation developed here suggests that CSR is a mandatory obligation and not an optional voluntary provision for corporates as it is closely related to the primary functions of businesses.

It has direct link to the legal obligations and accountability. Regulation is pre-requisite for effective discharge of the bundle of obligations of businesses for corporate accountability without which both legal and moral responsibilities have weak foundations. The paper discusses the intrinsic connection between responsibility and accountability as a natural foundation for the nexus between CSR and corporate accountability. This paper sets out to develop a formal structure by linking responsibility with accountability. It suggests that social obligations and economic goals are akin to moral and legal responsibilities that are intrinsically linked to each other. As firms are unlikely to fulfil these responsibilities in the absence of accountability, the paper proposes a novel theoretical foundation linking responsibility with accountability as a basis for regulating CSR.

The responsibilities under the CSR must be seen as the moral responsibilities that are related to the functional role of businesses and to the potential impacts that businesses can have. The concept of CSR developed here, as an indispensable moral obligation rooted in business relation and impact relation, provides a clear grounding for regulating CSR. This identifies the microfoundations of responsibility, and demonstrates that accountability through regulation is essential for fulfilling moral obligations. In summary, this article makes several compelling contributions to the scholarship on ethics and CSR. It provides a foundation for developing a framework of social obligations regarding what , to whom , and the extent of responsibilities while underscoring the role of obligations in proactively engaging business in socially benefitting duties in addition to refraining them from activities that cause harm to the society.

Furthermore, it suggests that the legal and moral responsibilities should be taken together as the bundle of obligations of businesses to effectively discharge their functions with accountability inevitably linked to moral responsibility, thus, underscoring the need for regulating CSR for accountability. Furthermore, the paper provides a compelling new approach towards CSR by identifying it with immediate moral obligations that arise through business relation and impact relation while discharging the primary functions and the associated legal responsibilities. Through this, the paper constructs boundaries for CSR and enables the development of an effective regulatory regime for CSR around the world. Aaronson, S.

Journal of Business Ethics, 59 , — Article Google Scholar. Abah, A. Legal regulation of CSR: the case of social media and gender-based harassment. Google Scholar. Adams, C. The ethical, social and environment reporting-performance portrayal gap. Triple bottom line: A review of the literature. Agudelo, M. A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 4 1 , 1. Aguinis, H. Organizational responsibility: doing good and doing well. Zedeck Ed. Journal of Management, 38 4 , — Alamgir, F. Contested compliance regimes in global production networks: Insights from the Bangladesh garment industry.

Alves, I. Green spin everywhere: how green washing reveals the limits of the CSR paradigm. Amao, O. Corporate social responsibility, human rights and the law: multinational corporations in developing countries. Abingdon: Routledge. Amodu, N. Regulation and enforcement of corporate social responsibility in corporate Nigeria. Journal of African Law, 61 1 , — Aurora, V. The business of human rights: an evolving agenda for corporate responsibility. London: Zed Books Ltd. Baden, D. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1 1 , 8. Barnett, M. The business case for corporate social responsibility: A critique and an indirect path forward. Barrett, W. Barry, V. Moral issues in business. Belmont: Wadsworth.

Beckers, A. Towards a regulatory private law approach for CSR self-regulation? The effect of private law on corporate CSR strategies. European Review of Private Law, 27 2 , — Berliner, D. From norms to programs: The United Nations global compact and global governance. BHRC Business and human rights resource center. Accessed on 4 Aug Bivins, T. Responsibility and accountability.

Bronstein Eds. Bondy, K. Multinational corporation codes of conduct: Governance tools for corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16 4 , — Bowen, H. Social responsibility of the businessman. New York: Harper. Buhmann, K. Corporate social responsibility: What role for law? Some aspects of law and CSR. Integrating human rights in emerging regulation of corporate social responsibility: The EU case.

International Journal of Law in Context, 7 2 , — Carroll, A. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4 4 , — The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34 4 , 39— Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a definitional construct. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12 1 , 85— International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1 1 , 3.

Chauvey, J. The normativity and legitimacy of CSR disclosure: evidence from France. Journal of Business Ethics, 4 , — Chhaparia, P. Corporate social responsibility in India: the legal evolution of CSR policy. Amity Global Business Review, 13 1 , 79— Dahlsrud, A. How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15 1 , 1— Davis, K.

Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review, 2 3 , 70— The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. The Academy of Management Journal, 16 2 , — Demirbag, M. Varieties of CSR: institutions and socially responsible behaviour. International Business Review, 26 6 , — Dentchev, N. The role of governments in the business and society debate. On voluntarism and the role of governments in CSR: towards a contingency approach.

Business Ethics: A European Review, 24 4 , — Devlin, P. The enforcement of morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dhiman, A. Effect of self-accountability on self-regulatory behaviour: A quasi-experiment. Journal of Business Ethics, 1 , 79— Dillard, J. Human rights within an ethic of accountability. In: Corporate social responsibility Vol. Routledge in association with GSE Research. Donaldson, T. Corporations and morality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Drucker, P. Converting social problems into business opportunities: The new meaning of corporate social responsibility.

California Management Review, 26 , Dworkin, G. Devlin was right: Law and the enforcement of morality. William and Mary Law Review, 40 , Dworkin, R. Lord Devlin and the enforcement of morals. The Yale Law Journal, 75 6 , — Eabrasu, M. A moral pluralist perspective on corporate social responsibility: From good to controversial practices. Eccles, R. One report: integrated reporting for a sustainable strategy. Hoboken: Wiley. The integrated reporting movement: meaning, momentum, motives, and materiality. Meaning and momentum in the integrated reporting movement. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 27 2 , 8— Eccles, Robert G. A comparative analysis of integrated reporting in ten countries.

Elkington, J. Towards the sustainable corporation: win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36 2 , 90— Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing. Accounting for the triple bottom line. Measuring Business Excellence, 2 3 , 18— Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8 1 , 37— Harvard Business Review, Freeman, I.

The meaning of corporate social responsibility: The vision of four nations. Journal of Business Ethics, 3 , — Freeman, R. Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman: Boston. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Book Google Scholar. Friedman, M. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. Frink, D. Towards a Theory of Accountability in organisations and human resource management.

Ferris Ed. Stamford: JAI Press. Gatti, L. Are we moving beyond voluntary CSR? Goldberg, J. Tort law and moral luck. Cornell Law Review, 92 , Green, L. Positivism and the inseparability of law and morals. New York University Law Review, 83 , Idemudia, U. Analysis of the Canadian national corporate social responsibility strategy: Insights and implications. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25 5 , — IIRC Integrated reporting, international integrated reporting council.

Jamali, D. CSR institutionalized myths in developing countries: An imminent threat of selective decoupling. Jansen, N. The idea of legal responsibility. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 34 2 , — Jenkins, R. Globalization, corporate social responsibility and poverty. International Affairs, 81 3 , — Kara, P. European Company Law, 15 4 , — Keith, N. Evolution of corporate accountability: From moral panic to corporate social responsibility. Business Law International, 11 , Knudsen, J. Government regulation of international corporate social responsibility in the US and the UK: how domestic institutions shape mandatory and supportive initiatives. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 56 1 , — Lamarche, T. Does CSR contribute to sustainable development?

What a regulation approach can tell us. Review of Radical Political Economics, 50 1 , — Laplume, A. Stakeholder theory: reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34 6 , — Lee, M. A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10 1 , 53— Leonidou, C. Gray shades of green: Causes and consequences of green skepticism.

Journal of Business Ethics , 2 , — Levitt, T. The dangers of social-responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 36 , Luo, J. Winning us with trifles: adverse selection in the use of philanthropy as insurance. Strategic Management Journal, 39 10 , — Macdonald, K. The meaning and purposes of transnational accountability. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 73 4 , — Malesky, E. The danger of not listening to firms: government responsiveness and the goal of regulatory compliance. The Academy of Management Journal, 60 5 , — Participation, government legitimacy, and regulatory compliance in emerging economies: a firm-level field experiment in Vietnam.

American Political Science Review, 2 , — Matten, D. The Academy of Management Review, 33 2 , — McInerney, T. Putting regulation before responsibility: towards binding norms of corporate social responsibility. Cornell International Law Journal, 40 ,

Electoral manipulation is not rare: some Elements Of Accountability Theory point out that in Elements Of Accountability Theory last two Elements Of Accountability Theory up to one Elements Of Accountability Theory of elections suffered some form of Elements Of Accountability Theory manipulation. December Elements Of Accountability Theory Thus, they are not Book Report On Freak The Mighty By Rodman Philbrick rooted in morality or Elements Of Accountability Theory but are closely intertwined Elements Of Accountability Theory legal responsibilities associated with the primary functions. According to Griffin.

Web hosting by Somee.com