➊ Argumentative Essay On Disabled People

Wednesday, December 15, 2021 3:04:02 PM

Argumentative Essay On Disabled People

Hearing Impairment Argumentative Essay On Disabled People expect to straighten Argumentative Essay On Disabled People Singer's head, but maybe I could Driving Age Research Paper a student or two. A Triathlon Informative Speech Argumentative Essay On Disabled People says, ''It appears that your objections to assisted Argumentative Essay On Disabled People are essentially tactical. Within the disability rights community, Argumentative Essay On Disabled People is less confidence. Robert Phiddian's article "Have you eaten yet? Argumentative Essay On Disabled People was a little surprised by the question about meat eating.

How to Write an Eye-Catching Essay Introduction - Scribbr 🎓

Why should art classes be higher in the list of priorities than technical or science courses? How can the right perception of art help pupils in future life? The core curriculum of the high school should not be too broad. Why do we have to narrow down our focus in high school? Explain how teenagers will benefit from studying particular subjects instead of getting general knowledge. Convince your readers about the importance of focusing on a specific field in high school. A gap year before entering the university is beneficial. Give persuading evidence why students should take a gap year.

What are the advantages? Make your readers debate whether a gap year is worth considering. Finally, convince them that it is worth it. Mobile phones should not be allowed in school. State your position regarding the usage of smartphones during the learning process. What adverse ramifications do the mobile phones have on the academic results of pupils? Persuade your readers to prohibit phone usage in school.

Traditional education is more effective than remote learning. How the benefits of the conventional way of learning outweigh the advantages of remote education? Compare the aspects of remote learning for different age groups: 1st grade age, 6th grade age, and a college student. The media played a crucial role in promoting the Vietnam War. Technological advancement of the 17th century was a new era in world history. The historical influence of Abraham Lincoln should become a role model for modern political figures. Americans should have abolished slavery in the United States way earlier.

The four voyages by Christopher Columbus are crucial in the progress of world history. Cultural exchanges in the medieval period significantly impacted the civilizations. Protestant reformation was the most influential Christian movement. Japanese women in the Middle Ages should have been more powerful. The age of exploration. Who are the key figures? How did they impact world history formation? Convince your readers of the importance of the age of exploration. The Mayan calendar system did not predict the end of the world. Investigate the Mayan calendar system. What is your explanation of the fact that the calendar system ended in the year ? Persuade your readers that the suggestions about the end of the world in are false.

Racial discrimination in America violated human rights to a great extend. Give a brief overview of racial discrimination in the USA. Persuade the readers to perceive racial discrimination as an act of human rights violation. Apollo 11 — the first spaceflight that landed people on the Moon. Discuss the importance of this event. Convince your readers about the significance of the Moon exploration. History studying should become the top priority for students. The knowledge of history may help to prevent mistakes from the past. So, persuade your readers to explore historical events. Holocaust should not be justified and denied. What are the horrible consequences of holocaust tragedy? Analyze an opinion regarding the denial of the holocaust.

Persuade the readers not to support this idea. Civil rights of black Americans should not be limited. Migration should not be restricted because it has certain benefits to modern countries. In the battle of socialism vs. Nationalism in international relations should be accepted. E-government should become transparent and accountable for the citizens. Individual rights versus the common good. Express your position regarding the issue.

What do you support: individual rights or common good? Persuade the readers to follow your ideas. Gay marriage should be allowed. Elaborate on your arguments and provide counterarguments. Exclude harsh comments and offensive language from the narrative. The death penalty cannot be justified. Why do you think so? Give clear arguments to support your opinion. If you believe that the death penalty is justifiable, prove your position. Electronic voting in the United States should not be banned. Present the positive sides of this way of voting and convince the readers in your rightness.

Then, provide counterarguments. Abortion should be legal. Provide clear arguments to express your position. Or provide counterarguments to contradict the idea of abortion legalization. Community services should be provided for mentally disabled people. Equality and diversity are the main social issues. Interpersonal communication skills are crucial in modern society. Gender inequalities in the 21st century should be overcome. Should the Canadian government legalize prostitution?

China should take specific steps to overcome the overpopulation problem. Implementing more tough punishments on the lawbreakers should reduce the crime rates of the USA. Does family promote or limit mobility? Choose one side of the issue and provide clear arguments to support your ideas. Divorce has negative effects on children. Do you agree with this statement? Convince the readers to accept your point of view by stating your position clearly and powerfully.

Birth control should be monitored on a governmental level. Express your opinion regarding birth control in modern society. Conduct a study on the cultural, religious, and political aspects of the birth control issue. Is there the right age to get married? Decide if there are any age suggestions to create a family or no? Support your choice with bright ideas and appropriate examples. To resolve the conflict, we need to know the nature of the conflict. Do you agree or disagree with this idea? Provide strong arguments to make people believe in your point of view.

How do you think psychology works while resolving the conflict? Competing theories are the core of economic development. Demand and supply correlation in the market matters a lot. If we want to stabilize the economy, we have to implement the monetary policy. Should big banks be broken up? We should consider the relationship between money supply and inflation while preventing the high level of inflation. Industrialization plays a significant role in economic development. Small business owners should receive financial support during the period of crisis. The role of understanding the goals of human resource management in the context of human capital theory. Explain the significance of effective HR management for a business flourishing.

Persuade your readers to invest enough resources in human capital. Exchange regimes have a significant impact on macroeconomic performance. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Provide well-developed arguments to prove your point of view. Persuade your readers to accept your position. Consumer behavior is different in every country. If you agree, develop this idea by providing strong arguments. Either way, support your arguments with supporting evidence. Make your readers follow your opinion. The understanding of the basic concepts of economics is essential for every person.

Explain how the knowledge of economics can help people to manage their money wisely. How to survive during the crisis? How to lead a business successfully, etc. Persuade your readers to study the basics of economics. Planes should newer take off if weather conditions are inappropriate. Never drive a car if you are under the alcohol or drug effect. Hybrid cars are environmentally friendly, so they should become the future of the transportation industry. Why should people study driving? The usage of alternative energy resources should reshape the global transportation infrastructure. The governments should invest enough money in public transport advancement. Cars usage should be regulated. A school bus should be checked at least once a month to ensure the safety of pupils.

The reserves of petroleum should be replenished to provide a proper transportation industry operation. The shipping of essential goods during the state of emergency quarantine, dangerous natural conditions, etc. We should use public transport instead of private cars to save the environment. Hybrid engine vs. Examine the positive and negative aspects of both of them. Which one would you prefer? Persuade your readers to support your opinion by giving clear arguments. Information technology influences the logistics industry to a great extent.

Provide appropriate examples of the IT impact on logistics. Convince your readers of the importance of your opinion. The role of transportation in the development of tourism. Prove your audience that transportation progress has a direct impact on tourism opportunities. We have to reduce the use of crude oil in the transportation industry. What are the possible adverse ramifications of such oil usage? Persuade your readers to limit applying this type of fuel. The government should control the overpopulation to prevent consequences for the environment. Human activity should be limited to preserve biodiversity.

We have to examine an ecologically sustainable approach. Alternative energy sources are essential for saving the planet. We should try our best to live a zero-waste lifestyle. Saving endangered species must be a top priority issue for environmental organizations. Solar energy can save the environment. The conservation of global resources is necessary for maintaining the lifecycle of the planet. Stopping deforestation will prevent the loss of natural habitat for animals. Tourism negatively affects wildlife. Comment no the negative consequences of traveling on nature.

If you believe that tourism does not harm wildlife, provide counterarguments to claim your position. Farming has to be wise. Explain how intensive farming damages nature. Convince your readers about the importance of following the farming rules. The Prime Days on Amazon should be banned. Explain how the incredibly low prices on items during the Prime Days result in extremely high costs for the environment.

Persuade your readers to resist the desire to buy unnecessary goods from Amazon. Without rainforests, our planet will suffocate. Prove the significance of the preservation of the rainforests for the environment. Globalization influences computer technologies to a great extent. The government should implement Internet censorship. Cloud computing is an innovative era in computer science. Cyberbullying should be controlled to prevent a negative influence on youth. Dependency on computers is a considerable threat to human well-being.

Data and information security should be a top concern of every internet user. Investing money in developing information technology systems is profitable for companies. To prevent the development of serious illnesses, we should use genetic technology. Technological advancement should focus on the improvement of the health sector. A scientific revolution started the technological advancement. Convince your readers about the importance of the scientific revolution in technological development.

E-books or audiobooks will never replace paper books. State your position clearly and make your readers accept it. Nowadays, society is too dependent on computer technologies. Comment on its negative and positive sides in the life of modern people. Persuade the readers not to overuse technology in everyday life. Technology and science complement each other. Provide clear arguments to prove this idea or counterarguments to disprove it. Music has a significant impact on culture. Music preferences depend on personality type. I decide to send Singer a copy. In response, he sends me the nicest possible e-mail message.

Dear Harriet if he may. Just back from Australia, where he's from. Agrees with my comments on the world situation. Supports my work against institutionalization. And then some pointed questions to clarify my views on selective infanticide. I reply. Fine, call me Harriet, and I'll reciprocate in the interest of equality, though I'm accustomed to more formality. Skipping agreeable preambles, I answer his questions on disability-based infanticide and pose some of my own. Answers and more questions come back.

Back and forth over several weeks it proceeds, an engaging discussion of baby killing, disability prejudice and related points of law and philosophy. Dear Harriet. Dear Peter. Singer seems curious to learn how someone who is as good an atheist as he is could disagree with his entirely reasonable views. At the same time, I am trying to plumb his theories. What has him so convinced it would be best to allow parents to kill babies with severe disabilities, and not other kinds of babies, if no infant is a ''person'' with a right to life?

I learn it is partly that both biological and adoptive parents prefer healthy babies. But I have trouble with basing life-and-death decisions on market considerations when the market is structured by prejudice. I offer a hypothetical comparison: ''What about mixed-race babies, especially when the combination is entirely nonwhite, who I believe are just about as unadoptable as babies with disabilities? Singer agrees there is a problem. Preferences based on race are unreasonable. Preferences based on ability are not. To Singer, it's pretty simple: disability makes a person ''worse off. Are we ''worse off''? I don't think so. Not in any meaningful sense. There are too many variables. For those of us with congenital conditions, disability shapes all we are.

Those disabled later in life adapt. We take constraints that no one would choose and build rich and satisfying lives within them. We enjoy pleasures other people enjoy, and pleasures peculiarly our own. We have something the world needs. Pressing me to admit a negative correlation between disability and happiness, Singer presents a situation: imagine a disabled child on the beach, watching the other children play. It's right out of the telethon. I expected something more sophisticated from a professional thinker. I respond: ''As a little girl playing on the beach, I was already aware that some people felt sorry for me, that I wasn't frolicking with the same level of frenzy as other children. This annoyed me, and still does. But, really, I've had enough. I suggest to Singer that we have exhausted our topic, and I'll be back in touch when I get around to writing about him.

He responds by inviting me to Princeton. I fire off an immediate maybe. But there are things to consider. Not Dead Yet says -- and I completely agree -- that we should not legitimate Singer's views by giving them a forum. We should not make disabled lives subject to debate. Moreover, any spokesman chosen by the opposition is by definition a token. But even if I'm a token, I won't have to act like one. And anyway, I'm kind of stuck. If I decline, Singer can make some hay: ''I offered them a platform, but they refuse rational discussion.

My invitation is to have an exchange of views with Singer during his undergraduate course. He also proposes a second ''exchange,'' open to the whole university, later in the day. This sounds a lot like debating my life -- and on my opponent's turf, with my opponent moderating, to boot. I offer a counterproposal, to which Singer proves amenable. I will open the class with some comments on infanticide and related issues and then let Singer grill me as hard as he likes before we open it up for the students. Later in the day, I might take part in a discussion of some other disability issue in a neutral forum.

Singer suggests a faculty-student discussion group sponsored by his department but with cross-departmental membership. I decide to go with the advisers who counsel me to do the gig, lie low and get out of Dodge. I ask Singer to refer me to the person who arranges travel at Princeton. I imagine some capable and unflappable woman like my sister, Beth, whose varied job description at a North Carolina university includes handling visiting artists. Singer refers me to his own assistant, who certainly seems capable and unflappable enough. However, almost immediately Singer jumps back in via e-mail. What to do? I know I shouldn't be so accommodating, but I say I can make do with an inaccessible room if it has certain features.

Other logistical issues come up. We go back and forth. Questions and answers. Do I really need a lift-equipped vehicle at the airport? Can't my assistant assist me into a conventional car? How wide is my wheelchair? By the time we're done, Singer knows that I am 28 inches wide. I have trouble controlling my wheelchair if my hand gets cold. I am accustomed to driving on rough, irregular surfaces, but I get nervous turning on steep slopes. Even one step is too many. I use a bedpan, not a toilet. None of this is a secret; none of it cause for angst. But I do wonder whether Singer is jotting down my specs in his little note pad as evidence of how ''bad off'' people like me really are. I realize I must put one more issue on the table: etiquette. I was criticized within the movement when I confessed to shaking Singer's hand in Charleston, and some are appalled that I have agreed to break bread with him in Princeton.

I think they have a very good point, but, again, I'm stuck. I'm engaged for a day of discussion, not a picket line. It is not in my power to marginalize Singer at Princeton; nothing would be accomplished by displays of personal disrespect. However, chumminess is clearly inappropriate. I tell Singer that in the lecture hall it can't be Harriet and Peter; it must be Ms. Johnson and Mr. He seems genuinely nettled. Shouldn't it be Ms.

Johnson and Professor Singer, if I want to be formal? All right, he says. I describe this awkward social situation to the lawyer in my office who has served as my default lunch partner for the past 14 years. He gives forth a full-body shudder. He has no idea what he's in for. Being a disability rights lawyer lecturing at Princeton does confer some cachet at the Newark airport. I need all the cachet I can get. Delta Airlines has torn up my power chair. It is a fairly frequent occurrence for any air traveler on wheels. When they inform me of the damage in Atlanta, I throw a monumental fit and tell them to have a repair person meet me in Newark with new batteries to replace the ones inexplicably destroyed.

Then I am told no new batteries can be had until the morning. It's Sunday night. On arrival in Newark, I'm told of a plan to put me up there for the night and get me repaired and driven to Princeton by 10 a. I'm lecturing at I need to get there tonight, go to sleep and be in my right mind tomorrow. You're lecturing? They told us it was a conference. We need to get you fixed tonight! Carla, the gate agent, relieves me of the need to throw any further fits by undertaking on my behalf the fit of all fits. Carmen, the personal assistant with whom I'm traveling, pushes me in my disabled chair around the airport in search of a place to use the bedpan.

However, instead of diaper-changing tables, which are functional though far from private, we find a flip-down plastic shelf that doesn't look like it would hold my 70 pounds of body weight. It's no big deal; I've restricted my fluids. But Carmen is a little freaked. It is her first adventure in power-chair air travel. I thought I prepared her for the trip, but I guess I neglected to warn her about the probability of wheelchair destruction. I keep forgetting that even people who know me well don't know much about my world.

I wake up tired. I slept better than I would have slept in Newark with an unrepaired chair, but any hotel bed is a near guarantee of morning crankiness. I tell Carmen to leave the TV off. I don't want to hear the temperature. I do the morning stretch. Medical people call it passive movement, but it's not really passive. Carmen's hands move my limbs, following my precise instructions, her strength giving effect to my will. Carmen knows the routine, so it is in near silence that we begin easing slowly into the day. I let myself be propped up to eat oatmeal and drink tea. Then there's the bedpan and then bathing and dressing, still in bed. As the caffeine kicks in, silence gives way to conversation about practical things.

Carmen lifts me into my chair and straps a rolled towel under my ribs for comfort and stability. She tugs at my clothes to remove wrinkles that could cause pressure sores. She switches on my motors and gives me the means of moving without anyone's help. They don't call it a power chair for nothing. I drive to the mirror. I do my hair in one long braid. Even this primal hairdo requires, at this stage of my life, joint effort. I undo yesterday's braid, fix the part and comb the hair in front.

Carmen combs where I can't reach. I divide the mass into three long hanks and start the braid just behind my left ear. Section by section, I hand it over to her, and her unimpaired young fingers pull tight, crisscross, until the braid is fully formed. A big polyester scarf completes my costume. Carmen lays it over my back. I tie it the way I want it, but Carmen starts fussing with it, trying to tuck it down in the back.

I tell her that it's fine, and she stops. On top of the scarf, she wraps the two big shawls that I hope will substitute for an overcoat. I don't own any real winter clothes. I just stay out of the cold, such cold as we get in Charleston. We review her instructions for the day. Keep me in view and earshot. Be instantly available but not intrusive. Be polite, but don't answer any questions about me. I am glad that she has agreed to come. She's strong, smart, adaptable and very loyal. But now she is digging under the shawls, fussing with that scarf again.

Singer knows lots of people eat meat. Now he'll know some crips sit on sheepskin. The walk is cold but mercifully short. The hotel is just across the street from Princeton's wrought-iron gate and a few short blocks from the building where Singer's assistant shows us to the elevator. The elevator doubles as the janitor's closet -- the cart with the big trash can and all the accouterments is rolled aside so I can get in. Evidently there aren't a lot of wheelchair people using this building. We ride the broom closet down to the basement and are led down a long passageway to a big lecture hall. As the students drift in, I engage in light badinage with the sound technician.

He is squeamish about touching me, but I insist that the cordless lavaliere is my mike of choice. I invite him to clip it to the big polyester scarf. The students enter from the rear door, way up at ground level, and walk down stairs to their seats. I feel like an animal in the zoo. I hadn't reckoned on the architecture, those tiers of steps that separate me from a human wall of apparent physical and mental perfection, that keep me confined down here in my pit.

It is 5 before Singer is loping down the stairs. I feel like signaling to Carmen to open the door, summon the broom closet and get me out of here. My talk to the students is pretty Southern. I've decided to pound them with heart, hammer them with narrative and say ''y'all'' and ''folks. I talk about justice. Even beauty and love. I figure they haven't been getting much of that from Singer. Of course, I give them some argument too. I mean to honor my contractual obligations.

I lead with the hypothetical about mixed-race, nonwhite babies and build the ending around the question of who should have the burden of proof as to the quality of disabled lives. And woven throughout the talk is the presentation of myself as a representative of a minority group that has been rendered invisible by prejudice and oppression, a participant in a discussion that would not occur in a just world.

I let it go a little longer than I should. Their faces show they're going where I'm leading, and I don't look forward to letting them go. But the clock on the wall reminds me of promises I mean to keep, and I stop talking and submit myself to examination and inquiry. Singer's response is surprisingly soft. Maybe after hearing that this discussion is insulting and painful to me, he doesn't want to exacerbate my discomfort. His reframing of the issues is almost pro forma, abstract, entirely impersonal. Likewise, the students' inquiries are abstract and fairly predictable: anencephaly, permanent unconsciousness, eugenic abortion.

I respond to some of them with stories, but mostly I give answers I could have e-mailed in. The next student wants to work the comparison of disability and race, and Singer joins the discussion until he elicits a comment from me that he can characterize as racist. He scores a point, but that's all right. I've never claimed to be free of prejudice, just struggling with it. Singer proposes taking me on a walk around campus, unless I think it would be too cold. What the hell? Let's go out and see how I do.

He doesn't know how to get out of the building without using the stairs, so this time it is my assistant leading the way. Carmen has learned of another elevator, which arrives empty. When we get out of the building, she falls behind a couple of paces, like a respectful chaperone. In the classroom there was a question about keeping alive the unconscious. In response, I told a story about a family I knew as a child, which took loving care of a nonresponsive teenage girl, acting out their unconditional commitment to each other, making all the other children, and me as their visitor, feel safe.

This doesn't satisfy Singer. I see no need to state an objection, with no stenographer present to record it; I'll play the game and let him continue. Done right, it could be profoundly beautiful. Not the way it has to be. As a society, we should pay workers to provide that care, in the home. In some places, it's been done that way for years.

That woman shouldn't be forced to do it, any more than my family should be forced to do my care. Singer takes me around the architectural smorgasbord that is Princeton University by a route that includes not one step, unramped curb or turn on a slope. Within the strange limits of this strange assignment, it seems Singer is doing all he can to make me comfortable. I was a little surprised by the question about meat eating.

That was out of left field. But -- I think what he wanted to know is how you can have such high respect for human life and so little respect for animal life. It doesn't make a lot of sense to me. I have lived in blissful ignorance all these years, and I'm not prepared to give that up today. He stops. This is where your colleagues with Not Dead Yet set up their blockade. My brothers and sisters were here before me and behaved far more appropriately than I am doing. A van delivers Carmen and me early for the evening forum. Singer says he hopes I had a pleasant afternoon. Yes, indeed. I report a pleasant lunch and a very pleasant nap, and I tell him about the Christopher Reeve Suite in the hotel, which has been remodeled to accommodate Reeve, who has family in the area.

We talk about the disability rights critique of Reeve and various other topics. Singer is easy to talk to, good company. Too bad he sees lives like mine as avoidable mistakes. I'm looking forward to the soft vegetarian meal that has been arranged; I'm hungry. Assisted suicide, as difficult as it is, doesn't cause the kind of agony I felt discussing disability-based infanticide.

In this one, I understand, and to some degree can sympathize with, the opposing point of view -- misguided though it is. My opening sticks to the five-minute time limit. I introduce the issue as framed by academic articles Not Dead Yet recommended for my use. Andrew Batavia argues for assisted suicide based on autonomy, a principle generally held high in the disability rights movement. In general, he says, the movement fights for our right to control our own lives; when we need assistance to effect our choices, assistance should be available to us as a matter of right.

If the choice is to end our lives, he says, we should have assistance then as well. But Carol Gill says that it is differential treatment -- disability discrimination -- to try to prevent most suicides while facilitating the suicides of ill and disabled people. The social-science literature suggests that the public in general, and physicians in particular, tend to underestimate the quality of life of disabled people, compared with our own assessments of our lives. The case for assisted suicide rests on stereotypes that our lives are inherently so bad that it is entirely rational if we want to die.

I side with Gill. What worries me most about the proposals for legalized assisted suicide is their veneer of beneficence -- the medical determination that, for a given individual, suicide is reasonable or right. It is not about autonomy but about nondisabled people telling us what's good for us. In the discussion that follows, I argue that choice is illusory in a context of pervasive inequality.

Choices are structured by oppression. We shouldn't offer assistance with suicide until we all have the assistance we need to get out of bed in the morning and live a good life. Common causes of suicidality -- dependence, institutional confinement, being a burden -- are entirely curable. Singer, seated on my right, participates in the discussion but doesn't dominate it.

During the meal, I occasionally ask him to put things within my reach, and he competently complies. I feel as if I'm getting to a few of them, when a student asks me a question. The words are all familiar, but they're strung together in a way so meaningless that I can't even retain them -- it's like a long sentence in Tagalog. I can only admit my limitations. Can you rephrase it? A little while later, my right elbow slips out from under me. This is awkward. Normally I get whoever is on my right to do this sort of thing. Why not now? I gesture to Singer. He leans over, and I whisper, ''Grasp this wrist and pull forward one inch, without lifting. He sees that now I can again reach my food with my fork.

And he may now understand what I was saying a minute ago, that most of the assistance disabled people need does not demand medical training. A philosophy professor says, ''It appears that your objections to assisted suicide are essentially tactical. What if we assume that such conditions do not exist?

How wide is my wheelchair? Prove to your readers that several songs played on a guitar can create a warm Argumentative Essay On Disabled People cozy atmosphere. More recently, Greek Heroism In Homers Odyssey Ohio inmate amazon value chain not die when his Argumentative Essay On Disabled People were incorrectly Argumentative Essay On Disabled People. Data Argumentative Essay On Disabled People information Argumentative Essay On Disabled People should be a top concern of every internet user.

Web hosting by Somee.com