⒈ Much Ado About Nothing Trickery And Deceit Analysis

Sunday, December 12, 2021 4:21:24 PM

Much Ado About Nothing Trickery And Deceit Analysis



Bookmark the Repetition In Kings Speech. To remove this difficulty, children are taught to look down on their nurses, to treat them as mere Much Ado About Nothing Trickery And Deceit Analysis. Bouillhonnas, his uncle. The Much Ado About Nothing Trickery And Deceit Analysis and tricks played on people often Much Ado About Nothing Trickery And Deceit Analysis the best What Caused The Great Depression to make people fall Much Ado About Nothing Trickery And Deceit Analysis love, or to help someone get what they want, or to lead someone to realize their mistake. They are almost strangers; how should they love one another? Much Ado About Nothing Trickery And Deceit Analysis part of this Much Ado About Nothing Trickery And Deceit Analysis may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means without the written permission of the copyright owner. Don't you care?! Click the counter to see Transmissible Illness In Prison debt.

Much Ado About Nothing by William Shakespeare - Summary \u0026 Analysis

The new-born infant cries, his early days are spent in crying. He is alternately petted and shaken by way of soothing him; sometimes he is threatened, sometimes beaten, to keep him quiet. We do what he wants or we make him do what we want, we submit to his whims or subject him to our own. There is no middle course; he must rule or obey. Thus his earliest ideas are those of the tyrant or the slave. He commands before he can speak, he obeys before he can act, and sometimes he is punished for faults before he is aware of them, or rather before they are committed.

Thus early are the seeds of evil passions sown in his young heart. At a later day these are attributed to nature, and when we have taken pains to make him bad we lament his badness. In this way the child passes six or seven years in the hands of women, the victim of his own caprices or theirs, and after they have taught him all sorts of things, when they have burdened his memory with words he cannot understand, or things which are of no use to him, when nature has been stifled by the passions they have implanted in him, this sham article is sent to a tutor. The tutor completes the development of the germs of artificiality which he finds already well grown, he teaches him everything except self-knowledge and self-control, the arts of life and happiness.

When at length this infant slave and tyrant, crammed with knowledge but empty of sense, feeble alike in mind and body, is flung upon the world, and his helplessness, his pride, and his other vices are displayed, we begin to lament the wretchedness and perversity of mankind. We are wrong; this is the creature of our fantasy; the natural man is cast in another mould. Would you keep him as nature made him? Watch over him from his birth. Take possession of him as soon as he comes into the world and keep him till he is a man; you will never succeed otherwise. The real nurse is the mother and the real teacher is the father. Let them agree in the ordering of their duties as well as in their method, let the child pass from one to the other.

He will be better educated by a sensible though ignorant father than by the cleverest master in the world. For zeal will atone for lack of knowledge, rather than knowledge for lack of zeal. But the duties of public and private business! Duty indeed! There is no more charming picture than that of family life; but when one feature is wanting the whole is marred. If the mother is too delicate to nurse her child, the father will be too busy to teach him.

Their children, scattered about in schools, convents, and colleges, will find the home of their affections elsewhere, or rather they will form the habit of caring for nothing. Brothers and sisters will scarcely know each other; when they are together in company they will behave as strangers. When there is no confidence between relations, when the family society ceases to give savour to life, its place is soon usurped by vice. Is there any man so stupid that he cannot see how all this hangs together? A father has done but a third of his task when he begets children and provides a living for them. He owes men to humanity, citizens to the state. A man who can pay this threefold debt and neglect to do so is guilty, more guilty, perhaps, if he pays it in part than when he neglects it entirely.

Poverty, pressure of business, mistaken social prejudices, none of these can excuse a man from his duty, which is to support and educate his own children. If a man of any natural feeling neglects these sacred duties he will repent it with bitter tears and will never be comforted. But what does this rich man do, this father of a family, compelled, so he says, to neglect his children? He pays another man to perform those duties which are his alone. Mercenary man! Do not deceive yourself; it is not even a master you have hired for him, it is a flunkey, who will soon train such another as himself. There is much discussion as to the characteristics of a good tutor. My first requirement, and it implies a good many more, is that he should not take up his task for reward.

There are callings so great that they cannot be undertaken for money without showing our unfitness for them; such callings are those of the soldier and the teacher. Then find a friend. I see no other course. A tutor! What a noble soul! Indeed for the training of a man one must either be a father or more than man. It is this duty you would calmly hand over to a hireling! The more you think of it the harder you will find it. The tutor must have been trained for his pupil, his servants must have been trained for their master, so that all who come near him may have received the impression which is to be transmitted to him. We must pass from education to education, I know not how far.

How can a child be well educated by one who has not been well educated himself! Can such a one be found? I know not. But let us assume that this prodigy has been discovered. We shall learn what he should be from the consideration of his duties. I fancy the father who realises the value of a good tutor will contrive to do without one, for it will be harder to find one than to become such a tutor himself; he need search no further, nature herself having done half the work. Some one whose rank alone is known to me suggested that I should educate his son.

He did me a great honour, no doubt, but far from regretting my refusal, he ought to congratulate himself on my prudence. Had the offer been accepted, and had I been mistaken in my method, there would have been an education ruined; had I succeeded, things would have been worse—his son would have renounced his title and refused to be a prince. Few, I think, will be tempted to make me such an offer when they have read this book, and I beg any one who would do so to spare his pains. I have had enough experience of the task to convince myself of my own unfitness, and my circumstances would make it impossible, even if my talents were such as to fit me for it.

I have thought it my duty to make this public declaration to those who apparently refuse to do me the honour of believing in the sincerity of my determination. If I am unable to undertake the more useful task, I will at least venture to attempt the easier one; I will follow the example of my predecessors and take up, not the task, but my pen; and instead of doing the right thing I will try to say it. I know that in such an undertaking the author, who ranges at will among theoretical systems, utters many fine precepts impossible to practise, and even when he says what is practicable it remains undone for want of details and examples as to its application.

I have therefore decided to take an imaginary pupil, to assume on my own part the age, health, knowledge, and talents required for the work of his education, to guide him from birth to manhood, when he needs no guide but himself. This method seems to me useful for an author who fears lest he may stray from the practical to the visionary; for as soon as he departs from common practice he has only to try his method on his pupil; he will soon know, or the reader will know for him, whether he is following the development of the child and the natural growth of the human heart.

This is what I have tried to do. Lest my book should be unduly bulky, I have been content to state those principles the truth of which is self-evident. But as to the rules which call for proof, I have applied them to Emile or to others, and I have shown, in very great detail, how my theories may be put into practice. Such at least is my plan; the reader must decide whether I have succeeded. At first I have said little about Emile, for my earliest maxims of education, though very different from those generally accepted, are so plain that it is hard for a man of sense to refuse to accept them, but as I advance, my scholar, educated after another fashion than yours, is no longer an ordinary child, he needs a special system.

Then he appears upon the scene more frequently, and towards the end I never lose sight of him for a moment, until, whatever he may say, he needs me no longer. I pass over the qualities required in a good tutor; I take them for granted, and assume that I am endowed with them. As you read this book you will see how generous I have been to myself. Were it possible, he should become a child himself, that he may be the companion of his pupil and win his confidence by sharing his games. Childhood and age have too little in common for the formation of a really firm affection. Children sometimes flatter old men; they never love them.

People seek a tutor who has already educated one pupil. This is too much; one man can only educate one pupil; if two were essential to success, what right would he have to undertake the first? With more experience you may know better what to do, but you are less capable of doing it; once this task has been well done, you will know too much of its difficulties to attempt it a second time—if ill done, the first attempt augurs badly for the second. It is one thing to follow a young man about for four years, another to be his guide for five-and-twenty.

You find a tutor for your son when he is already formed; I want one for him before he is born. Your man may change his pupil every five years; mine will never have but one pupil. You distinguish between the teacher and the tutor. Another piece of folly! Do you make any distinction between the pupil and the scholar? There is only one science for children to learn—the duties of man. This science is one, and, whatever Xenophon may say of the education of the Persians, it is indivisible.

Besides, I prefer to call the man who has this knowledge master rather than teacher, since it is a question of guidance rather than instruction. He must not give precepts, he must let the scholar find them out for himself. If the master is to be so carefully chosen, he may well choose his pupil, above all when he proposes to set a pattern for others. If I had my choice I would take a child of ordinary mind, such as I assume in my pupil. It is ordinary people who have to be educated, and their education alone can serve as a pattern for the education of their fellows. The others find their way alone. The birthplace is not a matter of indifference in the education of man; it is only in temperate climes that he comes to his full growth.

The disadvantages of extremes are easily seen. A man is not planted in one place like a tree, to stay there the rest of his life, and to pass from one extreme to another you must travel twice as far as he who starts half-way. If the inhabitant of a temperate climate passes in turn through both extremes his advantage is plain, for although he may be changed as much as he who goes from one extreme to the other, he only removes half-way from his natural condition. It seems also as if the brain were less perfectly organised in the two extremes.

Neither the negroes nor the Laps are as wise as Europeans. So if I want my pupil to be a citizen of the world I will choose him in the temperate zone, in France for example, rather than elsewhere. In the north with its barren soil men devour much food, in the fertile south they eat little. This produces another difference: the one is industrious, the other contemplative. Society shows us, in one and the same spot, a similar difference between rich and poor. The one dwells in a fertile land, the other in a barren land.

The poor man has no need of education. The education of his own station in life is forced upon him, he can have no other; the education received by the rich man from his own station is least fitted for himself and for society. Moreover, a natural education should fit a man for any position. Now it is more unreasonable to train a poor man for wealth than a rich man for poverty, for in proportion to their numbers more rich men are ruined and fewer poor men become rich.

Let us choose our scholar among the rich; we shall at least have made another man; the poor may come to manhood without our help. For the same reason I should not be sorry if Emile came of a good family. He will be another victim snatched from prejudice. Emile is an orphan. No matter whether he has father or mother, having undertaken their duties I am invested with their rights. He must honour his parents, but he must obey me. That is my first and only condition. I must add that there is just one other point arising out of this; we must never be separated except by mutual consent. This clause is essential, and I would have tutor and scholar so inseparable that they should regard their fate as one.

If once they perceive the time of their separation drawing near, the time which must make them strangers to one another, they become strangers then and there; each makes his own little world, and both of them being busy in thought with the time when they will no longer be together, they remain together against their will. The disciple regards his master as the badge and scourge of childhood, the master regards his scholar as a heavy burden which he longs to be rid of. Both are looking forward to the time when they will part, and as there is never any real affection between them, there will be scant vigilance on the one hand, and on the other scant obedience. But when they consider they must always live together, they must needs love one another, and in this way they really learn to love one another.

The pupil is not ashamed to follow as a child the friend who will be with him in manhood; the tutor takes an interest in the efforts whose fruits he will enjoy, and the virtues he is cultivating in his pupil form a store laid up for his old age. This agreement made beforehand assumes a normal birth, a strong, well-made, healthy child. A father has no choice, and should have no preference within the limits of the family God has given him; all his children are his alike, the same care and affection is due to all. Crippled or well-made, weak or strong, each of them is a trust for which he is responsible to the Giver, and nature is a party to the marriage contract along with husband and wife.

But if you undertake a duty not imposed upon you by nature, you must secure beforehand the means for its fulfilment, unless you would undertake duties you cannot fulfil. If you take the care of a sickly, unhealthy child, you are a sick nurse, not a tutor. To preserve a useless life you are wasting the time which should be spent in increasing its value, you risk the sight of a despairing mother reproaching you for the death of her child, who ought to have died long ago.

I would not undertake the care of a feeble, sickly child, should he live to four score years. I want no pupil who is useless alike to himself and others, one whose sole business is to keep himself alive, one whose body is always a hindrance to the training of his mind. If I vainly lavish my care upon him, what can I do but double the loss to society by robbing it of two men, instead of one? Let another tend this weakling for me; I am quite willing, I approve his charity, but I myself have no gift for such a task; I could never teach the art of living to one who needs all his strength to keep himself alive.

The body must be strong enough to obey the mind; a good servant must be strong. I know that intemperance stimulates the passions; in course of time it also destroys the body; fasting and penance often produce the same results in an opposite way. The weaker the body, the more imperious its demands; the stronger it is, the better it obeys. All sensual passions find their home in effeminate bodies; the less satisfaction they can get the keener their sting. A feeble body makes a feeble mind.

Hence the influence of physic, an art which does more harm to man than all the evils it professes to cure. I do not know what the doctors cure us of, but I know this: they infect us with very deadly diseases, cowardice, timidity, credulity, the fear of death. What matter if they make the dead walk, we have no need of corpses; they fail to give us men, and it is men we need. Medicine is all the fashion in these days, and very naturally. It is the amusement of the idle and unemployed, who do not know what to do with their time, and so spend it in taking care of themselves. If by ill-luck they had happened to be born immortal, they would have been the most miserable of men; a life they could not lose would be of no value to them.

Such men must have doctors to threaten and flatter them, to give them the only pleasure they can enjoy, the pleasure of not being dead. I will say no more at present as to the uselessness of medicine. My aim is to consider its bearings on morals. Still I cannot refrain from saying that men employ the same sophism about medicine as they do about the search for truth. They assume that the patient is cured and that the seeker after truth finds it. They fail to see that against one life saved by the doctors you must set a hundred slain, and against the value of one truth discovered the errors which creep in with it.

The science which instructs and the medicine which heals are no doubt excellent, but the science which misleads us and the medicine which kills us are evil. Teach us to know them apart. That is the real difficulty. If we were content to be ignorant of truth we should not be the dupes of falsehood; if we did not want to be cured in spite of nature, we should not be killed by the doctors. We should do well to steer clear of both, and we should evidently be the gainers. I do not deny that medicine is useful to some men; I assert that it is fatal to mankind. You will tell me, as usual, that the doctors are to blame, that medicine herself is infallible.

Well and good, then give us the medicine without the doctor, for when we have both, the blunders of the artist are a hundredfold greater than our hopes from the art. This lying art, invented rather for the ills of the mind than of the body, is useless to both alike; it does less to cure us of our diseases than to fill us with alarm. It does less to ward off death than to make us dread its approach. It exhausts life rather than prolongs it; should it even prolong life it would only be to the prejudice of the race, since it makes us set its precautions before society and our fears before our duties.

It is the knowledge of danger that makes us afraid. If we thought ourselves invulnerable we should know no fear. The poet armed Achilles against danger and so robbed him of the merit of courage; on such terms any man would be an Achilles. Would you find a really brave man? Seek him where there are no doctors, where the results of disease are unknown, and where death is little thought of. By nature a man bears pain bravely and dies in peace. It is the doctors with their rules, the philosophers with their precepts, the priests with their exhortations, who debase the heart and make us afraid to die. Give me a pupil who has no need of these, or I will have nothing to do with him. No one else shall spoil my work, I will educate him myself or not at all.

That wise man, Locke, who had devoted part of his life to the study of medicine, advises us to give no drugs to the child, whether as a precaution, or on account of slight ailments. I will go farther, and will declare that, as I never call in a doctor for myself, I will never send for one for Emile, unless his life is clearly in danger, when the doctor can but kill him.

I know the doctor will make capital out of my delay. If the child dies, he was called in too late; if he recovers, it is his doing. So be it; let the doctor boast, but do not call him in except in extremity. As the child does not know how to be cured, he knows how to be ill. The one art takes the place of the other and is often more successful; it is the art of nature. When a beast is ill, it keeps quiet and suffers in silence; but we see fewer sickly animals than sick men. How many men have been slain by impatience, fear, anxiety, and above all by medicine, men whom disease would have spared, and time alone have cured.

I shall be told that animals, who live according to nature, are less liable to disease than ourselves. Well, that way of living is just what I mean to teach my pupil; he should profit by it in the same way. Hygiene is the only useful part of medicine, and hygiene is rather a virtue than a science. To learn what system is most beneficial you have only to study those races remarkable for health, strength, and length of days. If common observation shows us that medicine neither increases health nor prolongs life, it follows that this useless art is worse than useless, since it wastes time, men, and things on what is pure loss. Not only must we deduct the time spent, not in using life, but preserving it, but if this time is spent in tormenting ourselves it is worse than wasted, it is so much to the bad, and to reckon fairly a corresponding share must be deducted from what remains to us.

A man who lives ten years for himself and others without the help of doctors lives more for himself and others than one who spends thirty years as their victim. I have tried both, so I think I have a better right than most to draw my own conclusions. For these reasons I decline to take any but a strong and healthy pupil, and these are my principles for keeping him in health. I will not stop to prove at length the value of manual labour and bodily exercise for strengthening the health and constitution; no one denies it. Nearly all the instances of long life are to be found among the men who have taken most exercise, who have endured fatigue and labour.

In the seventeenth year of Charles II. He served in all the campaigns of William III. This man has never drunk anything but small beer; he has always lived on vegetables, and has never eaten meat except on few occasions when he made a feast for his relations. He has always been accustomed to rise with the sun and go to bed at sunset unless prevented by his military duties. He is now in his th year; he is healthy, his hearing is good, and he walks with the help of a stick. In spite of his great age he is never idle, and every Sunday he goes to his parish church accompanied by his children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren.

It will be clear that it forms such an essential part of my practice that it is enough to get hold of the idea without further explanation. When our life begins our needs begin too. The new-born infant must have a nurse. If his mother will do her duty, so much the better; her instructions will be given her in writing, but this advantage has its drawbacks, it removes the tutor from his charge.

If we must have a strange nurse, make a good choice to begin with. It is one of the misfortunes of the rich to be cheated on all sides; what wonder they think ill of mankind! It is riches that corrupt men, and the rich are rightly the first to feel the defects of the only tool they know. Everything is ill-done for them, except what they do themselves, and they do next to nothing. When a nurse must be selected the choice is left to the doctor.

What happens? The best nurse is the one who offers the highest bribe. I may not argue about it so elegantly as the surgeon, but I shall be more reliable, I shall be less deceived by my zeal than the doctor by his greed. There is no mystery about this choice; its rules are well known, but I think we ought probably to pay more attention to the age of the milk as well as its quality. The first milk is watery, it must be almost an aperient, to purge the remains of the meconium curdled in the bowels of the new-born child.

Little by little the milk thickens and supplies more solid food as the child is able to digest it. It is surely not without cause that nature changes the milk in the female of every species according to the age of the offspring. Thus a new-born child requires a nurse who has recently become mother. There is, I know, a difficulty here, but as soon as we leave the path of nature there are difficulties in the way of all well-doing. The wrong course is the only right one under the circumstances, so we take it.

The nurse must be healthy alike in disposition and in body. The violence of the passions as well as the humours may spoil her milk. Moreover, to consider the body only is to keep only half our aim in view. The milk may be good and the nurse bad; a good character is as necessary as a good constitution. If you choose a vicious person, I do not say her foster-child will acquire her vices, but he will suffer for them. Ought she not to bestow on him day by day, along with her milk, a care which calls for zeal, patience, gentleness, and cleanliness. If she is intemperate and greedy her milk will soon be spoilt; if she is careless and hasty what will become of a poor little wretch left to her mercy, and unable either to protect himself or to complain.

The wicked are never good for anything. The choice is all the more important because her foster-child should have no other guardian, just as he should have no teacher but his tutor. This was the custom of the ancients, who talked less but acted more wisely than we. The nurse never left her foster-daughter; this is why the nurse is the confidante in most of their plays. A child who passes through many hands in turn, can never be well brought up. At every change he makes a secret comparison, which continually tends to lessen his respect for those who control him, and with it their authority over him.

If once he thinks there are grown-up people with no more sense than children the authority of age is destroyed and his education is ruined. A child should know no betters but its father and mother, or failing them its foster-mother and its tutor, and even this is one too many, but this division is inevitable, and the best that can be done in the way of remedy is that the man and woman who control him shall be so well agreed with regard to him that they seem like one. The nurse must live rather more comfortably, she must have rather more substantial food, but her whole way of living must not be altered, for a sudden change, even a change for the better, is dangerous to health, and since her usual way of life has made her healthy and strong, why change it?

Country women eat less meat and more vegetables than towns-women, and this vegetarian diet seems favourable rather than otherwise to themselves and their children. When they take nurslings from the upper classes they eat meat and broth with the idea that they will form better chyle and supply more milk. I do not hold with this at all, and experience is on my side, for we do not find children fed in this way less liable to colic and worms. That need not surprise us, for decaying animal matter swarms with worms, but this is not the case with vegetable matter. This supplies vegetable juices to their milk. There are still those species which are unable to eat anything but flesh, if such there are, which I very much doubt.

The milk of herbivorous creatures is sweeter and more wholesome than the milk of the carnivorous; formed of a substance similar to its own, it keeps its goodness and becomes less liable to putrifaction. If quantity is considered, it is well known that farinaceous foods produce more blood than meat, so they ought to yield more milk. If a child were not weaned too soon, and if it were fed on vegetarian food, and its foster-mother were a vegetarian, I do not think it would be troubled with worms.

Milk derived from vegetable foods may perhaps be more liable to go sour, but I am far from considering sour milk an unwholesome food; whole nations have no other food and are none the worse, and all the array of absorbents seems to me mere humbug. There are constitutions which do not thrive on milk, others can take it without absorbents. People are afraid of the milk separating or curdling; that is absurd, for we know that milk always curdles in the stomach. This is how it becomes sufficiently solid to nourish children and young animals; if it did not curdle it would merely pass away without feeding them. A hard-working man who ate nothing but soup would soon waste away. He would be far better fed on milk, just because it curdles.

It is not the nature of the food that makes a vegetable diet indigestible, but the flavouring that makes it unwholesome. Reform your cookery, use neither butter nor oil for frying. Butter, salt, and milk should never be cooked. Let your vegetables be cooked in water and only seasoned when they come to table. The vegetable diet, far from disturbing the nurse, will give her a plentiful supply of milk. Cocchi and his opponent Dr. Bianchi on this important subject. The things are contradictory. It enters every pore of a soft and tender skin, it has a powerful effect on their young bodies. Its effects can never be destroyed. So I should not agree with those who take a country woman from her village and shut her up in one room in a town and her nursling with her.

I would rather send him to breathe the fresh air of the country than the foul air of the town. Men are not made to be crowded together in ant-hills, but scattered over the earth to till it. The more they are massed together, the more corrupt they become. Disease and vice are the sure results of over-crowded cities. Of all creatures man is least fitted to live in herds. Huddled together like sheep, men would very soon die. This is literally as well as figuratively true. Men are devoured by our towns. In a few generations the race dies out or becomes degenerate; it needs renewal, and it is always renewed from the country. Send your children to renew themselves, so to speak, send them to regain in the open fields the strength lost in the foul air of our crowded cities.

Women hurry home that their children may be born in the town; they ought to do just the opposite, especially those who mean to nurse their own children. They would lose less than they think, and in more natural surroundings the pleasures associated by nature with maternal duties would soon destroy the taste for other delights. The new-born infant is first bathed in warm water to which a little wine is usually added.

I think the wine might be dispensed with. As nature does not produce fermented liquors, it is not likely that they are of much value to her creatures. In the same way it is unnecessary to take the precaution of heating the water; in fact among many races the new-born infants are bathed with no more ado in rivers or in the sea. Our children, made tender before birth by the softness of their parents, come into the world with a constitution already enfeebled, which cannot be at once exposed to all the trials required to restore it to health. Little by little they must be restored to their natural vigour. Begin then by following this custom, and leave it off gradually.

Wash your children often, their dirty ways show the need of this. If they are only wiped their skin is injured; but as they grow stronger gradually reduce the heat of the water, till at last you bathe them winter and summer in cold, even in ice-cold water. To avoid risk this change must be slow, gradual, and imperceptible, so you may use the thermometer for exact measurements. This habit of the bath, once established, should never be broken off, it must be kept up all through life. I value it not only on grounds of cleanliness and present health, but also as a wholesome means of making the muscles supple, and accustoming them to bear without risk or effort extremes of heat and cold.

As he gets older I would have the child trained to bathe occasionally in hot water of every bearable degree, and often in every degree of cold water. And if you doubt their innocence, they'll accuse you of anti-semetism and thus, discredit you, isolate you, and attack your livelihood. They do this by rewarding officials who display their loyalty for israel and retaliate against anyone who dissents. Israel had prior knowledge of and did absolutely nothing to stop it.

And afterward, they celebrated it. Israel then tried to urge the US to go to war with Iran - an expensive war that the US would pay for alone, while israel paid nothing. Yet, who controls the banks? Who controls the largest hedge funds on Wall Street? Who controls Hollywood? Who controls the news media? Who gets the most protection of any ethnic group or minority? All jews support and empower their own people, while everyone else is left out to dry. They are the most successful and most wealthy people in the world and they still want you to feel sorry for them.

Jews only help non-jews if they see an opportunity to benefit from it. All this sneaky shit, all the trickery, all the deceit - this is what Hitler warned us about. Having said all this - I don't hate all jews, I only hate the sneaky pieces of shit whose only mission is to get rich and watch the rest of the world burn - and there are a lot of them. I am not anti-semetic because anti-semetism only helps the jews. Being hateful toward jews causes rational people to feel sorry for them. And ultimately that sympathy is converted into power. If you hate jews, do it quietly. And act only when the opportunity arises. Reviewer: Anonymous - favorite favorite favorite favorite favorite - April 21, Subject: This is good This is good. Reviewer: Arbari - favorite favorite favorite favorite favorite - March 31, Subject I hate to be negative because I know the readers are all volunteers but I gave up at the second chapter.

I just couldn't deal with turgid, pompous delivery. The stated time for the book is about 20 hours. I'm sure 10 would have been quite enough. Reviewer: christian37ism - favorite favorite favorite favorite favorite - July 28, Subject: A precursory read in grasping Hitler's later endeavors I undertook to read this book solely to understand Hitler's motives, actions, plans, his antisemitism, aryanism, political and social ideologies, and philosophy of life, all as a backdrop leading up to his role in ww2.

This file only contained the first volume and was more simplistic in terms of the translator's diction. I read the second volume via book under the translation of Manheim and this version was a bit denser to follow but still enjoyable. What astounded me the most of his person was his keen comprehension of large-scale institutions such as forms of governments, public education, the armed services, social services, including the workforce. And was able to provide a thorough analysis whether right or wrong of the flaws or corruption of such, and even provide alternatives to bring about potential successes. His architectural background might have had something to do with this sharpness of mind, namely, to see the structure of things and their foundations. This writing also shed light on Nazi Germany's role and foreign policy in ww2.

To name a few: 1 Russia in the east was the ultimate end to the movement's means to ensure European land and soil for Germany's preservation. Hitler also admired Mussolini for his resistance to the Marxists. Hitler was assured France was to be attacked no matter what. As controversial as Hitler was and always will be, without his socio-political influence, world war 2 years most likely would not have happened. To have in history an extremist leader with such a record we need to delve into his mind to see if reasoning, albeit unsound, can be found. Thanks for the upload. Well narrated but this seems only to be Volume 1.

Volume 2 is missing. Reviewer: ColeslawtheGamer - favorite favorite favorite favorite favorite - November 15, Subject: Nice Book Skip to if you want to cut through all the prefaces, forwards, and other things in the beginning. Reviewer: GreatGoy - favorite favorite favorite favorite favorite - September 29, Subject: Redpill me daddy With cultural Marxism rampant, and numerous obvious jewish tools of propaganda, I enjoyed listening to Hitler's thought process when learning of the jew. Three generations later and it is a relevant as it was then.

I shared the struggle between logic and sentiment, hating the concept of racism, and viewing nationalism as mainly a blinding motivator for bloodshed. But I was wrong, and led by liberal policy. The motivator for bloodshed is the manipulation of nationalism, leading pointless wars that benefit jewish monopolies and the interests of israel by and large. Whether the culprit is cultural or genetic, their tendencies have cost millions of lives in this century alone in the pursuit of power and materialism. Not all are perverse or malicious, but many share the capacity nonetheless.

If you stretch it, some of the Chaos Gods in both Warhammer and Warhammer 40, might barely count as Chaotic Neutral. Nurgle might be the best example, since he does love you. A lot. Then we have Necoho and Malal, while not any of the greater chaos gods, act more benevolent than the other gods, in Malal's case, he practically only focuses on other chaos gods, since he represents chaos turned against itself, and Necoho is the god of atheism , which means he practically only targets religious cults of any kind, in addition to the other chaos gods. In the earliest fluff, all of the Chaos Gods were Chaotic Neutral, being neither good nor evil, but simply embodiments of a particular set of emotions and related concepts. Though many Chaos worshippers did end up sliding into extremism and becoming evil, it was perfectly valid to have a relatively "good" Chaos worshipper, who applied the teachings of their patron in a manner that was at least not actively dangerous to most, and maybe even sometimes beneficial — a Khorne Champion who would never harm the weak, instead seeking to fight and kill only the strong and deadly in order to prove themselves worthy of Khorne's ideals, for example.

Subsequent editions have played up the Chaotic Evil aspect of the Dark Gods, however. They aren't really concerned about anything but themselves, and rarely even pay attention to the mortals, unless they perceive something as a threat to them in fact, most of the horribly evil things champions of Chaos do is to attract the attention of the Gods for even a split second so that they could be elevated to daemonhood.

The Gods themselves don't really actively strive to do evil things, they just want to increase their own power. The Daemons and mortal followers of Chaos tend to be Chaotic Evil , however. The Chaos gods are treated as evil in the same way as Cthulhu is treated as evil, since they technically have a moral system that is beyond human comprehension. As to this, they technically are Chaotic Neutral, but due to human lack of understanding to the morals of the chaos gods, they appear Chaotic Evil in human moral terms.

Ogres and Orcs seem to fit in Fantasy. Orcs fit like they do in 40K, being bad but not really that much worse than the "good" armies, and Ogres are obsessed with conquering and eating everything on their path but will work for anyone for a good meal and some more gunpowder for their leadbelcher cannons, and they can be quite chummy when not on the opposite side of the battlefield. Legendary for his many eccentricities, his bouts of screaming rage, his periods of melancholy, his mercurial conduct at court, and his constant improprieties with the wives and daughters of the nobility.

In spite of his madness, he was proven to be a cunning tactician and skilled swordsman. They were switched to Chaotic Evil during 4th edition upon recognition that they were far more destructive than Chaotic Neutral typically exemplifies and their method of reproduction is terrifying Body Horror. Unlike the more noble high elves, they're a violently xenophobic culture of forest-dwelling nomads. In Pathfinder , the slaadi are replaced as Chaotic Neutral's exemplars by the serpentine proteans, the living embodiments of raw creative and destructive potential as opposed to the slaadi, who represented rampant self-indulgence, another aspect of Chaotic Neutral.

Perhaps not incidentally, the primordial gods of Egyptian myth, the Ogdoad, were depicted as frogs and snakes. Almost every Shadowrunner , and most Shadowrunning teams fall victim to this standpoint. The ones who go too evil find themselves obsessed with either blood magic or insane amounts of cybernetics , while the ones who wind up too good eventually go legitimate. Or start up a television show once their statute of limitations expires. While several characters in the Magic: The Gathering storylines fit this trope, most red-aligned characters are Chaotic Neutral, with a few slipping into Chaotic Good the flamekin or Chaotic Evil the Mercadians.

Their thought processes are generally non-linear, they leap from idea to seemingly often actually unrelated ideas for the sole purpose of learning new things, regardless of what those new things are and often without even questioning why they need to know them. Black in its most benevolent form is generally this or True Neutral. It's rare, but it certainly happens occasionally. The Destroyers factions in Monsterpocalypse , who go on destructive rampages out of pure instinct alone. The Planet Eaters mostly consume anything they can get their claws on. While the Savage Swarm smash anything that has bright and shiny lights.

The Dark from Nobilis third edition. Their goal is to encourage humans to pursue their own pleasure, even if it means their deaths, but unlike earlier versions where it was the death of humanity that they pursued it's more indifference to human survival than opposition to it that motivates them. Siegfried from The Ring of the Nibelung. Siegfried's disregard for law is emphasised by him breaking the Lawful Neutral Wotan's spear, a representation of law, while his father died when Wotan used his spear against him.

Siegfried doesn't seem entirely good, coming across as rude and arrogant. His father Siegmund is a product by his father Wotan to create someone Chaotic Neutral who can defy the laws that prevent Wotan stopping threats to his power. However Wotan manipulating him into this means he isn't truly free and he comes across as trying to be Chaotic Good. Video Games. Joel from The Last of Us. He fights and kills people strictly to survive, but there's one other thing. He sacrifices all of humanity to save one girl; Ellie. That shows that he is selfish, and didn't even give Ellie a choice on whether she wanted to not be used for a cure.

He builds his own country to avoid law, is willing to be a mercenary for any country no matter who's in charge, etc. In Snake Eater , he even says so. Arcana Heart : Lilica Felchenerow's main goal is to just have fun and play harmless pranks, she actively tries to break the rules, and she doesn't care much for the dimensional disturbance. Insufferable Genius Kira Daidohji probably fancies herself to be a Lawful Evil Overlord , but despite her intelligence and overblown ego, her plans are too simplistic and random to make her really dangerous.

Arcueid Brunestud of Tsukihime is quite a complex case. She is whimsical, naive, somewhat self-centered, and definitely Chaotic She is probably hanging between Chaotic Neutral and Chaotic Good. Most notable is Krieg, who for the most part is so insane that basic communication is difficult for him, but does have a deeply suppressed conscience and tries to prevent himself from killing innocent people. The NPC Mr. Torgue is a complete lunatic whose moral scale isn't divided into good and evil, but into "awesome" and "not-awesome". On the positive side, treating women with respect is filed under "awesome". On the negative side, so are all explosions, regardless of source, scale, or location. He once tried to blow up the planet he was standing on because he thought it would be cool, and sold his weapons company for pocket change and a high-five.

Mad Moxxi would probably count as well: She's kind of a psycho but helps out the players in fighting Handsome Jack in the second game. And while she runs the Underdome in the first game, which may seem cruel, she can be surprisingly compassionate and soft heared as well. Eiji Shinjo, the brash main character of Battle Arena Toshinden , probably started out with this alignment, nevermind his more heroic anime incarnation. He used to only care about himself, his only objective being to surpass his brother Sho in fighting skill.

He eventually matures, and by the end of the third game, he can probably be considered Chaotic Good. Akuma from the Street Fighter series would qualify. One could be excused for thinking he's evil, but he has his own code of honor that prohibits him from harming innocents or fighting in a match that would be too unfair case in point, he stopped his fight with Gen when he realized that he was sick. He also killed M. Bison during the time he tried to make Ryu fall to the Satsui no Hadou. Guilty Gear : In his days as Dr. Baldhead, Faust was Chaotic Evil.

After coming to terms with the death of one of his patients , he seeks redemption and acts much like Tezuka's Black Jack. However, he still takes some pleasure in bloodshed — as pointed out by I-No. Insisting on "curing" Chipp with an oversized scalpel and risking his own life to protect Venom, both due to to his interpretation of the Hippocratic oath, he might not be eligible for the Chaotic Good badge just yet. Team Fortress 2 : The Demoman clearly qualifies. He does look extremely unpredictable, does not play by the team's rules and uses explosives to inhibit the opposing team's advancement in the level, being a rugged Chaotic Neutral in this situation, even being a defensive class. Most of the characters in the game can be considered this. The soldier, if not transitioning between Chaotic Evil or Lawful Stupid is an outright type 5 headcase.

Every action he takes that isn't fueled by his desire to atone for his past sins is fueled by his anger at anyone whom he views as an enemy. Near the end of the Orc campaign he falls once again to his Chaotic Evil side but redeems himself by killing the demon responsible for cursing the Orcs and thus freeing them from the demons in exchange for his life.

His main goal is power, and at a brief glance it seems that he's willing to do absolutely anything for it , but he shows from time to time that there are things that still matter to him, such as his childhood friend Tyrande and the lands he grew up in. One reading of his actions would be "a really selfish and greedy guy who tries to be good to show off but doesn't really know how to".. The goblin race as a whole, who care about nothing but their own personal freedom, profit, and explosions — in that order. They never pick a side unless their freedom is put at stake and Word of God says they'd be just as at home in the Horde or the Alliance — the Alliance simply accidentally attacked the Kezanian goblins first, prompting their joining the Horde.

This seems to be the default alignment of elementals in the Warcraft universe. While they are almost always hostile to the Titan created races, they are more like amoral forces of nature than actively malicious. Annah, the fiercely passionate, mercurial young tiefling from Planescape: Torment , is a thief, a guttersnipe, and a corpse-seller—but while she has a sharp tongue she doesn't have a genuinely mean bone in her body.

The pyromaniac mage Ignus wants to burn down The Multiverse , but his mind has been scrambled too much to have a concept of "morality" and "malice" and is unaware of why setting fire to everything is something other people would have a problem with. They set him permanently on fire as a punishment, and he likes it. Nordom is Chaotic Neutral because he was split from the Hive Mind and values his own newfound individuality more than anything even if he covers it up in Robo Speak and generally behaving like a Lawful Neutral regular Modron.

Sonic the Hedgehog : Rouge the Bat cares for her own hedonism above all else. Her personal theme song, "Fly in the Freedom", is all about how no one can tell her what to do, and that she lives for her own desires above all else. She only works for G. Eggman before as well. On various occasions, Rouge has risked the safety of Angel Island because she wants to steal the Master Emerald, not caring that it's a sacred treasure to Knuckles and the echidnas or that stealing it will cause Angel Island to fall from the sky. N, even though taking it might put Blaze's world in danger. Yet even as she took the Emerald, Rouge contemplated keeping it for herself. Ultimately, while Rouge's intentions aren't malicious, she's far too hedonistic and selfish to be a 'Good' character.

The Chaotix as a team are this, taking any job that pays even if they don't know who their employer is. While generally determined to finish the job, it's only so that Vector can pay the rent, and they go about the job in a rather haphazard manner. As individuals, they are of Chaotic Good alignment. Shadow comes to this realization in the Semi Dark - Hero ending of his own game.

He declares that only he knows what's best and that no one can tell him what to do, and he demonstrates this by killing Dr. Neverwinter Nights 2 : Despite her character sheet listing her as True Neutral , the tiefling rogue Neeshka has a personality that practically screams Chaotic Neutral with most of her suggestions being small-scale evil or chaotic, but she still seems to have a nice streak that shows through on occasion. Then there's Qara, who is listed as this alignment, but is Chaotic Stupid — she's quite selfish and tends to want to set things on fire just because she can, regardless of what the object is or the safety of anyone else around.

One can make the interpretation that Qara is merely too pampered and immature to understand the concept of control, however, and she will risk her life for a true friend, though in the end, her hatred of Sand proves much stronger than any bond of friendship she feels towards the Knight-Captain. Everyone in the Grand Theft Auto series is Chaotic Neutral, seeking only their personal profit; owing allegiance to nobody. Although the fact they kill people should count as Evil, you also have to consider that all the protagonists in Grand Theft Auto live in a world of crime where killing is like an everyday commute.

The probable exceptions would be Victor Vance from Grand Theft Auto: Vice City Stories who does what he does entirely out of necessity to help his sick brother, and though he absolutely hates what he's doing and tries not to hurt people, he also doesn't attempt to help them. Antonio Cipriani from Grand Theft Auto: Liberty City Stories could be argued to be Lawful Evil , since he operates within a hierarchy and has absolute loyalty to his crime family and is willing to do anything, up to and including leveling the entire Little Italy neighborhood to weaken a rival syndicate, to further his gang's goals. He even ground up a man who refused to pay protection money to prove to his own mother that he was as tough as his father, and then gave the man's remains to the man's own store to be sold as meat to customers.

Grunt also typifies this in Mass Effect 2 , seeking to determine who is the strongest by fighting everyone, regardless of clan or alignment. It could be argued he turned more toward Chaotic Good after his loyalty mission, though. He's trapped in the battle between his natural compassion and the aftereffects of spending two years in prison being painfully tortured and experimented on with Dark Eco. He eventually swings over to Neutral Good , though. The Daedra from The Elder Scrolls , despite being technically beyond good or evil, often come across as Chaotic Neutral.

Only problem is, their divine shenanigans can destroy entire worlds Some of them do deeds that are disagreeable to the inhabitants of Tameriel that earn them the "evil" status. Since he is the embodiment of madness, he could be compared to a pendulum that swings between Chaotic Evil, Chaotic Neutral and Chaotic Good, but tends to stick with Chaotic Neutral. On one hand, he can be psychopathic killing a person for having a beard and Ax-Crazy ; while on the other hand, he helped the Chimer who later became the dark elves move from Summerset Isle and form their pre-tribunal culture, and is the source of creativity. He's also very keen on punishing those that deserve it, or teaching lessons to people, usually in the oddest way possible.

So, in short, he IS the very definition of Chaotic Neutral. He does what he wants, and says fuck the consequences. Well, when his madness doesn't run in "take consequences into account a little bit too much"-ways he is the God of Madness Player characters. Atton Rand from Knights of the Old Republic II: The Sith Lords is mildly insane, largely out for himself, and it's rather tricky to predict exactly how he'll respond to anything. More specifically, Atton starts out neutral. How the Exile behaves toward him can guide his Character Development to either good or evil — but he remains chaotic regardless, and the fact that the Exile can gain influence with Atton through either kindness or total gore-spattered psychopathy says a great deal.

He mostly seems to follow his instincts while saving the world almost by accident, half the time being the one to cause the problem in the first place. The most infamous example in the series is Kirby: Squeak Squad , where the pink puff ball nearly causes the destruction of the universe because some mice stole a slice of cake from him The creators are on record as saying they treat Kirby as being basically a naive child. Kingdom Hearts : Axel. While ostensibly a member of the bad guys, he does what he wants, when he wants, through the entire series. In Chain of Memories , his duty seems to be that of The Mole , but he really only does his job because he wants to, not out of any sense of loyalty to the Organization.

Indeed, at one point he muses that "all the players are in place," and that he's looking forward to "one hell of a show. He follows his orders to bring Roxas back, but only because he himself has an interest in seeing him again. He kidnaps Kairi, but only because he knew it would bring Sora to their door that much quicker. At one point, he shows up and all but spells out the Organization's plot to Sora's face. He returns as complete-being Lea in Dream Drop Distance , unambiguously on the hero's side, so he may be closer to Chaotic Good now. He still loves screwing up other people's complicated schemes. First Encounter Assault Recon : Alma isn't really evil, just a very insane and very angry eight-year-old girl in a twenty-year-old's body.

All she wants is to be free to hold her children , and to be with a man she loves. And to get payback on Armacham, but considering what they did to her , it's almost justified. Disgaea and the rest of the Nippon Ichi games tend to have this as their default alignment for virtually all demons. For the main characters, that is assuming you get the good endings, at least. While they loudly proclaim their villainy, it generally comes down to a few childish pranks , and picking fights with each other in a world where coming back from the dead is a quick stop at the nurse's office and some chump change. They really just want to live their lives goofing off, and hanging out with the buddies that they may or may not willingly admit they have, and in any time of trouble, always come to the aid of their fellows.

Boomerang from Wild ARMs 1 has one goal in life: to fight the strongest opponent he can find. He is most definitely not a good person, but he isn't truly malicious either. A large part of the cast of Touhou Project can be classified in this alignment. Effectively a giant band of little girls with various powers who stir up trouble just because they're bored, or because they're surprisingly old and just want to have a little fun. Nobody seems to die in Gensokyo , and Defeat Means Friendship , so it's really difficult to definitively say anyone is evil in Touhou. Well, other than that one demonic cherry tree and possibly the resident Necromantic "wicked" hermit.

Knights in the Nightmare 's Meria. Some of her actions rescuing you, her Taking the Bullet scene lean a little towards Chaotic Good and others her power fixation towards Chaotic Evil , but she defiantly and repeatedly states that she's really only fighting for her own freedom. While destroying the evil LeChuck is a good thing, he mostly does it out of trying to get into Elaine's pants nevermind his Pant of Holding is big enough to put her in He lies, steals, and openly cheats to get what he wants — proper for a MIGHTY pirate , but hardly ethical; however, he doesn't do it out of malice well, except for nailing Stan into a previously-used coffin, but that's Stan.

In fact, he seems highly unaware of the consequences of his actions, and tends to refuse to take responsibility for his failures when it does blow up in his face. Two characters from BlazBlue are very different forms of Chaotic Neutral: Arakune, who is simply too insane to form any coherent thought beyond how to survive in his current state. Though he does have a few moments of lucidity usually towards Litchi and Kokonoe, whom he loves and hates, respectively , during which he's Chaotic Good. Kokonoe, whose singleminded devotion to bringing down Yuuki Terumi causes her to use any means whatsoever towards destroying him, up to and including nuclear warheads. That said, despite being a Jerkass , she isn't an actively malicious or evil person, and is shown to have genuine care towards her subordinates, particularly Tager.

There is also Ragna the Bloodedge, but he is only part-time Chaotic Neutral. The occasional neutrality is due to him waging a one-man war against the oppressive NOL, indiscriminately slaughtering every Mook and Punch-Clock Villain he is able to find in its branch institutions. He isn't waging this war for altruistic purposes, like wanting to free the people from oppression or bringing peace and stability, either. No, he simply wants revenge on the NOL and Terumi for fucking up his life. Jin Kisaragi, after his character development, becaomes this. Yeah, he's a dick , but he's got his Pet the Dog moments, and he doesn't go the extra step into becoming truly evil.

He was originally Neutral Evil , flying into Chaotic Evil territory whenever he bumps into Ragna or Noel , but he's cured of his insanity in the ending of the second game, after taking a level in badass. Raziel from Legacy of Kain. He's belligerent, defiant, and rebellious against most everyone he meets. He expresses no remorse at cutting down the mooks that get in his way, even though they are completely incapable of killing him, nor does he bat an eye at draining the souls of helpless victims chained to walls, though he's not as sadistic about it as Kain is. He rarely thinks his actions through, making choices that cause great harm only because they benefit, or could potentially benefit him in the short term.

Though he claims to be trying to restore balance to the world, his true motivation is selfish revenge and later, escaping a Fate Worse than Death , regardless of the consequences. Up until his Heroic Sacrifice , that is. Black Whirlwind from Jade Empire , an Ax-Crazy mercenary whose chaotic and impulsive actions sleeping with his employer's wife, cutting in two a girl two rivals were fighting over normally end in him having to kill everyone in self-defense. The only thing that stops him being Chaotic Evil is that he seems to regret this outcome, if only because he doesn't get paid.

Same goes for Cha Dawn from Alien Crossfire , leader of the Cult of Planet, whose ultimate goal is to respect Planet's environments at all costs , even if that means returning Planet to its pristine state making him at least borderline Chaotic Evil. Super Mario Bros. He has little interest in fighting for or against good or evil, only treasure. There's also Donkey Kong. Depending on the game, he either plays the Big Good or the Big Bad , depending on what his impulses tell him to do.

This also kinda-sorta overlaps with Blue-and-Orange Morality , as if you live on his island, you can trust that Donkey Kong will have your back. However, if you don't, you can't tell what his impulses tell him to do. The Snifits in Paper Mario: The Origami King collectively simply do what they feel like with no concern for anyone else. This is best seen when a large group of them squat the Ghost Town of Shroom City, renaming it "Snif City" and modifying the whole place as they see fit. If a Snifit wants to do good, he will do good things, like providing accurate information to travelers.

If a Snifit wants to do evil, he will do evil, like using an innocent Toad as a surfboard. Later in the game, a few more Snifits are found shirking off work at Shangri-Spa, and Mario forces them to get back to work. Depending on who you ask, Morrigan in Dragon Age: Origins may be of this alignment. She is consistent about the fact that she will not be controlled or restrained by laws and rules, but what pushes slightly closer to this then outright Chaotic Evil is that several times in her backstory she mentions avoiding fights rather than just killing people that get in her way, though she is easily capable of doing so.

However, her vanity and statements that power is the best method of getting personal freedom, and at least one VERY morally questionable action causes her to skirt Evil quite frequently. That said, Morrigan tends to be more Chaotic Stupid when with the Warden, making suggestions that would impede the party simply because they're more evil than the other choices. Anders in Awakening is a nice guy, but basically Chaotic Neutral at heart, as his goals are personal freedom for himself, but he otherwise finds it too much work to worry about the rest of the mages in Thedas.

Once merged with Justice, however In Dragon Age II , Isabela would have you believe that this is her alignment, but deep inside she's a surprisingly moral person. Her biggest weakness, appropriately, is the offer of getting a good ship and returning to the freedom of the sea. I cannot lie. He comes and goes like the wind Science isn't about why , it's about why not? Why is so much of our Science dangerous? Why not marry Safe Science if you love it so much?

In fact, why not invent a special "safety door" that won't hit you on the butt on the way out, because you are fired! Not you, test subject, you're doing fine. Yes, you. Your stuff. Out the front door. Parking lot. Fang: Pulse and Cocoon can rot for all I care. Whispers in the Wind 's main villains Bailey and his pirate crew fall in the category of chaotic neutral. They don't mind murdering and stealing but they can also do good if it serves their purpose. For example they first arrive in chapter 1 and create complete chaos in a town solely to set Scarlet on her journey -because for some reasons unknown to the reader- they need her.

Starting chapter 7, they set out on a quest to save a man and his son. In order to do this, they murder a lot of people in cold blood. It is unclear for now as to why they helped him but it was made obvious they didn't do it for justice or kindness of heart. Rocky Rickaby of Lackadaisy. He isn't a Wild Card ; he has a strong loyalty to the Lackadaisy crew. But in a series with no "good guys" or "bad guys" , where all the protagonists are criminals, Rocky falls squarely into Neutral territory. As for the Chaotic, after burning down the house and barn of some guys who tried to kill him : "I know it wasn't lawful, per se.

But I find the scope of the law can be rather limiting. What's lawful doesn't always coincide with what's right, Freckle. And that was very right. Sure, he'd call himself Chaotic Good , but he's This applies to the Jaegers of Girl Genius most of the time. The main exceptions are when they are directly obeying or protecting a Heterodyne, in accordance with their centuries-old oath bar Vole, who was kicked out of the Jaegers and now obeys Baron Wulfenbach.

Pintsize from Questionable Content. He's certainly chaotic, but he's not really good, considering the amount of gleeful havoc he spreads. But he's not really evil, since he never causes any lasting damage. Magarce from Tally Road. Diminutive feline Siamese pirate girl, as quick to kill you as she is to pounce you and ravage your innocence. Once you figure out she's Chaotic Neutral, she makes more sense- kinda. Coyote of Gunnerkrigg Court , in keeping with his nature as The Trickster. He is quite mischievous, and seems to have an agenda that is opposed to the Court, but he is not actively malicious, shows a great fondness for Ysengrim and Reynardine the latter of which he regards as a cousin , as well as towards Antimony and her dead mother even going so far as to hug Antimony after seeing her sadness while he reminisces about Surma.

Annie herself seems to be falling into this line of thinking as her feelings towards adults expands into full-blown disrespect for authority. The titular Schlock of Schlock Mercenary is chaotic neutral, with a tiny dash of good thrown in. He mainly fights just for the "BOOM", chugs Ovalkwik like a drug, considers kittens "comfort food", and has little respect even for the loose rules of Tagon's Toughs. In The Inexplicable Adventures of Bob!

She was effectively raised in a box, and so maintaining her personal freedom and avoiding confinement are overwhelmingly important to her. Larisa from Sandra and Woo is a classic example of this alignment. At the same time as her friend Cloud suggests to be quiet to not draw unnecessary attention to the group, she draws unnecessary attention to the group by pushing a cupboard out of a window which is smaller than the cupboard itself! There's also a better one: "It doesn't matter whether you win or lose, as long as you look cool doing it.

Nothing would deter him from succeeding! Duty indeed! An Ork thinks that by besieging your fortress they're doing you a favourbecause why Much Ado About Nothing Trickery And Deceit Analysis you build a fortress if you didn't want someone to come along Ambition In Macbeth And Wall Street fight you? Email Address:. Much Ado About Nothing Trickery And Deceit Analysis most infamous example in the series is Kirby: Squeak Squadwhere the pink puff ball nearly causes the destruction The Seleucid Empire the universe Much Ado About Nothing Trickery And Deceit Analysis some mice stole Much Ado About Nothing Trickery And Deceit Analysis slice of cake from Much Ado About Nothing Trickery And Deceit Analysis This is only possible when the memory Much Ado About Nothing Trickery And Deceit Analysis, the tongue does not stammer of itself.

Web hosting by Somee.com